Discover the distinction between parasitism and unfair competition, the legal bases, practical cases and remedies. A comprehensive, practical and documented guide written by a lawyer.

Unfair competition and parasitism undermine commercial loyalty, punishable by article 1240 of the French Civil Code for fault causing harm.
These practices harm innovative companies by exploiting their reputation or efforts without their own investment.
Mastering these concepts protects commercial interests in B2B and allows you to quickly take legal action.
Unfair competition includes acts contrary to competitive good faith, forming a civil fault.
It aims to protect the fair market against excesses that distort competition.
Basis: article 1240 Civil Code, requiring fault, harm and causation.
Although they share a common goal — the loyalty of economic relationships — parasitism and unfair competition present significant differences.
A brand condemned for having set up its business in the immediate vicinity of a competing chain, using the latter's visual codes and slogans, was sanctioned on the double basis of confusion (unfair competition) and parasitism (profit from advertising investments).
Example:
A distributor launches a product modelled on that of its competitor, reproducing the packaging down to the dominant color and the layout of the logos, creating a risk of confusion for the consumer.
Example:
Dissemination of fake reviews on social networks aimed at tarnishing the image of a competitor and diverting its customers.
Example:
Massive poaching of employees from a competing company, compromising its ability to continue its activities or exploiting its business secrets.
Example:
The reproduction by a player in the food sector of the concept, packaging and merchandising of a leading product, without assuming the costs of innovation and marketing.
“A former employee is prohibited, for a period of 12 months following the cessation of his duties, from directly or indirectly exercising a competing activity within a radius of 50 kilometers around Paris, under penalty of payment of compensation.”
Restrictive practices (e.g. market disorganization) can be added to acts of unfair or parasitic competition and give rise to specific sanctions (example: significant imbalance in the commercial relationship, abuse of economic dependence).
Non-competition compensation may be provided to compensate for the impossibility of exercising a post-contractual competing activity, provided that it is proportionate and limited in time and space.
Settling near a competitor is not in itself prohibited. Only unfair maneuvers (slavish copying, customer solicitation, confusion in presentation, etc.) are condemned. Thus, freedom of trade remains, subject to respect for loyalty.
Educational framework:
A service provider who creates a website that reproduces the navigation and design of a competitor identically, without added value or differentiation, is exposed to a conviction for parasitism, including in the absence of a situation of direct competition.
Parasitism is one of the branches of unfair competition, but it can occur without a situation of direct competition. It specifically aims at the appropriation of the efforts, investments, or reputation of an economic agent, while unfair competition encompasses all unfair behaviors in the customer race.
Competition (fair) is a fundamental principle of the market, promoting innovation and economic development. Parasitism, on the contrary, punishes the fact of taking advantage of the efforts of others without investment, distorting the game of competition.
In law, parasitism is a set of behaviors by which a company or an individual takes unfair advantage of the efforts, know-how or reputation of a third party, without compensation for equivalent personal efforts or investments, regardless of whether there is direct competition or not.
Article written by Guillaume Leclerc, lawyer in commercial contracts and commercial litigation in Paris.