Understand everything about bad leaver and good leaver clauses: definition, differences, concrete examples, risks and practical advice for SMEs. An expert guide written by a specialized lawyer in Paris to secure your partner agreements and executive contracts.

The drafting of a partners' agreement or an employment contract in an SME often involves anticipating the departure of a strategic partner or employee. The clauses Bad Leaver and Good Leaver are essential to secure your business, limit financial risks and promote a climate of trust. Understanding their mechanisms and their usefulness is fundamental.
The clause of Bad Leaver penalizes the partner or employee who leaves the company under faulty circumstances: resignation, serious misconduct, violation of commitments... It imposes the sale of its shares at a very disadvantageous price, much lower than their real value.
The clause of Good Leaver protects the outgoing person in the event of legitimate departure (retirement, illness, dismissal without fault, death, etc.). The sale price of the shares is then favorable, often close to the real or market value.
Imagine an SME with three founding partners. If one resigns to create a competitor, the bad leaver clause applies and he must sell his shares at nominal value, which limits his gain in value. If an associate leaves due to illness or retirement, the good leaver clause offers him a fair price.
In the event of qualification as a “Bad Leaver Associate” (resignation, serious misconduct, violation of the pact), the person transfers all of his shares to the company or to the designated partners, for a price equal to the nominal value or at a fixed discount (for example, 60% of the expert value).
French case law allows these clauses in partners' agreements, as long as the penalty is not disproportionate.
Example: the judgment of the Court of Cassation of 30 March 2016 validates the sale at the nominal value of a resigning partner, while recalling the prohibition of plunder or excessively penalizing clauses.
A clause is qualified as abusive if the penalty is excessive (symbolic price regardless of the context) or without contradictory control. The judge may cancel it if it infringes the fundamental rights of the person concerned.
In practice, the bad leaver/good leaver clause rather concerns partners' agreements, except in specific cases of shareholder or employee managers benefiting from BSPCE/shares.
Sanctions the wrongful departure, imposes the sale of shares at an unfavorable price.
Excessive, disproportionate or without real reason: cancellation possible by the judge.
The good leaver leaves the company for a legitimate reason and gets a good transfer price. The bad leaver leaves at fault and is sanctioned for the price.
Non-competition, mobility, exclusivity, variable remuneration.
The model is detailed above: to be adapted according to the particular situation.
Clause requiring the unfavourable transfer of shares in the event of a wrongful departure.
Clause involving an unjustified or excessive penalty or without a fair procedure.
Mastering bad leaver and good leaver clauses makes it possible to secure the capital and governance of your SME in the event of an unexpected departure. A good clause, tailor-made and validated by a specialist advisor, ensures your peace of mind.