Understand the combination of the employment contract and the social mandate: conditions, models, risks and case law. Complete, expert and educational article for SME managers.

The combination of an employment contract and a social mandate is a central problem for managers of SMEs, whether SARL or SAS. This subject, marked by abundant case law and practical specificities, raises numerous questions: what are the conditions for accumulating? What are the risks? What clauses should be inserted? What ceilings should be respected? This guide, written by an experienced lawyer, aims to enlighten you on all facets of the subject by integrating concrete examples, practical boxes and FAQ, in order to calmly anticipate your decisions.
Combining an employment contract with a corporate mandate consists, for a manager, in combining two statuses within the company: that of employee, subject to a relationship of subordination, and that of corporate officer, legal representative of the company. This situation frequently concerns SARL managers or SAS presidents.
The employment contract presupposes:
The social mandate involves:
It is essential to distinguish between the two statuses: an employee is subject to the authority of the employer, while a corporate officer acts on behalf of and in the interests of the company. This difference is at the heart of case law.
The combination of the employment contract and the social mandate is not automatic. Jurisprudence requires compliance with three major conditions:
1. The exercise of functions distinct from the social mandate
Example: A sales manager can combine the mandate of manager if he maintains commercial tasks separate from his management missions.
2. The existence of an effective relationship of subordination with respect to society
There must be a line manager (for example, the board of directors, the general meeting or a majority partner).
3. Remuneration for paid duties separate from that of mandatary
The absence of confusion between the two statutes makes it possible to avoid requalification by judges.
In a SARL, a manager can also act as an employee provided he is a minority or egalitarian. In principle, a majority manager will not be able to combine the two statuses.
Minoritary/egalitarian manager:
Majority manager:
In a SARL, the minority manager who owns 40% of the shares and who reports directly to the board of directors, in principle, meets the conditions for accumulation.
The president of an SAS can in principle combine the two statutes, provided that he exercises employee functions separate from his representation and management missions. The existence of a relationship of subordination, often materialized by a supervisory board or a majority partner, is necessary.
A president of SAS with a job description, objectives and monthly reports to the supervisory board was able to benefit from a separate employment contract.
On the other hand, a sole manager and majority partner of SARL was rejected on the grounds of lack of subordination.
The employment contract can be suspended in several situations:
Practical example:
A manager who has served as President of SAS may suspend his Commercial Director contract during his presidential term, before resuming at the end of this term.
Cumulative remuneration must respect certain social ceilings:
Attention to requalification!
The judge may requalify the situation in the absence of separate tasks or subordination. The use of a lawyer is therefore highly recommended to anticipate all URSSAF checks, legal compliance and contractual clarity.
Educational framework
The latest reforms have strengthened control over cumulation to combat social abuse. The legislator states that only compliance with the triple condition allows dual social protection. The doctrine calls for maximum contractual transparency.
Do you want to know more about the mandate contract?
Find our article which gives a general presentation of the mandate contract:
The combination of an employment contract and a social mandate offers interesting prospects for SME managers, provided they are rigorously supervised. Relying on case law, precise drafting and professional support is essential to secure the situation in the face of social and fiscal control.