Discover breach of trust in French criminal law: definition, constituent elements, concrete examples in business, sanctions, procedures for filing a complaint for breach of trust, and best practices for managers of SMEs.
.avif)
THEBreach of trust is a frequent criminal offense in business life: embezzlement by an employee, partner who appropriates cash, service provider who embezzls entrusted assets... For an SME manager, knowing how to identify, qualify and deal with these situations is essential to protect the company, its managers and its partners.
The objective of this article is to offer you a real “toolbox” to understandBreach of trust, illustrated by numerous concrete examples and oriented towards action: prevention, reaction, filing a complaint, management of evidence, coordination with other offenses (theft, abuse of social assets, fraud, etc.).
THEBreach of trust is defined by article 314-1 of the Criminal Code as the act of a person embezzling, to the detriment of others, funds, assets or any property that has been given to him and that he has accepted in order to return them, represent them or make a specific use of them. This offence therefore presupposes a regular initial delivery of the property, followed by a diversion contrary to the agreed destination.
In practice, we are talking aboutBreach of trust when a person betrays the use for which an asset was entrusted to him: cash flow entrusted to an employee, stock entrusted to a carrier, equipment managed by a service provider, funds entrusted as part of a mandate, etc. The central element is the Betrayal of trust placed in the perpetrator, hence the symbolic gravity of this offense for the commercial or professional relationship.
So we can talk aboutBreach of trust, three conditions must be met:
If any of these elements are missing, the offence ofBreach of trust is not established and it is necessary to turn to other qualifications (theft, contractual non-performance, civil fault, abuse of social assets, etc.).
For an SME manager, one of the important reflexes is not to describe everything as a “breach of trust”. Several related offenses coexist:
THEBreach of trust is distinguished by the regular initial delivery of the property (the company's bank card was voluntarily given to the employee, the vehicle to the partner, the cash register to a manager, etc.), followed by a subsequent embezzlement.
First element ofBreach of trust : the property is given regularly to the author. This discount can be:
Example SME: a manager entrusts his administrative manager with a bank card in the name of the company to pay professional expenses (suppliers, travel, hotels, etc.). The initial discount is regular, for a specific purpose: to serve the business of the company.
Second element: the misappropriation. The author uses the property otherwise than intended, to the detriment of the legitimate owner. This hijacking can take several forms:
Let's go back to the previous example: the administrative manager uses the company's bank card to pay for private trips, restaurants unrelated to the company, or allocate personal expenses to the company's accounts. There is misappropriation trusted funds.
Third pillar ofBreach of trust : thefraudulent intent, that is, the awareness on the part of the author that he is acting in contradiction with the agreed destination of the property. This intention can be deduced from objective circumstances:
Conversely, an isolated accounting error, a clumsy ranking or a one-off confusion are not necessarily enough to characterize theBreach of trust. In practice, it is often the accumulation of elements that makes it possible to convince the prosecutor's office or the judge.
A frequent case isBreach of trust over amounts of money within the SME:
In these cases, the funds were given voluntarily to the person because of their functions or the mission entrusted to them, and then diverted to the detriment of the company. We are typically in the field of complaint for breach of trust money.
THEBreach of trust often appears in relationships between partners, or between the company and its agents or intermediaries:
In these cases, managers are faced with a double challenge: maintaining the continuity of the company and managing the possible criminal dimension of the situation.
In some sectors (health, personal services, wealth management, etc.), many SMEs manage customers Vulnerable (elderly, sick, disabled, isolated...). THEBreach of trust on a vulnerable person is then a major risk:
In these situations, the criminal qualification may be heavier, due to the vulnerability of the victim. This is an essential point of vigilance for SME managers working in these sectors.
Can be assimilated to a breach of trust in practice, provided that the constituent elements are combined:
Each time, the pattern is the same: voluntary delivery, misuse, harm to the legitimate owner.
Conversely, some behaviors are similar but fall under other qualifications:
The challenge for the manager is to quickly have a clear analysis of the most relevant qualification, because this determines the strategy (filing a complaint, civil action, negotiation, disciplinary measures).
La proof of breach of trust is very often based on material elements:
As a manager, it is crucial to anticipate this probationary dimension: centralization of supporting documents, secure access to statements, preservation of contracts, etc.
In addition to the documents, the testimonies and factual findings play an important role:
In a file of breach of trust complaint, the more the manager is able to present a structured file (documents, chronology, flow analysis), the easier it will be for the authorities to assess the reality.
When it comes to a Breach of trust on a vulnerable person, the evidence must also relate to:
If your SME works with vulnerable people, it is prudent to put in place written procedures, double signatures, regular checks and alert mechanisms to identify these situations.
The question” When should you file a breach of trust complaint? ” often arises in a context of tension: we have identified anomalies, but we are hesitant to take the plunge. A few guidelines:
The lack of reaction from the manager can sometimes be poorly perceived, especially with regard to other partners, creditors or authorities.
For file a complaint for breach of trust, several options are available to you:
It is strongly recommended to be assisted by a lawyer in drafting the complaint, legally qualifying the facts and structuring the case, especially whenBreach of trust takes place in a context of conflict between partners or company difficulties.
The deposit of a breach of trust complaint does not replace other useful procedures:
The strategy must be thought out globally, taking into account the image of the company, internal relationships and judicial time, which is often long.
THEBreach of trust is punishable by imprisonment and a fine, with a ceiling that depends on the seriousness of the facts and the circumstances. For a natural person, sentences can reach several years of imprisonment and several hundreds of thousands of euros in fines.
In addition to criminal sanctions, the following may be added:
For a victim SME manager, these sanctions have an important deterrent and symbolic effect, but it should be borne in mind that the operational priority remains the recovery of funds and the protection of the company.
Some circumstances worsen theBreach of trust and expose the author to heavier sanctions:
In these hypotheses, the challenges of image, trust of financial partners and reputation for SMEs are particularly high.
Les contracts and internal documents are a first line of prevention ofBreach of trust :
Example of a clause (to be adapted):
“The Employee/Representative acknowledges that the bank card/proxy/equipment made available to him is exclusively intended for the performance of his functions within the Company.
Any use for personal purposes or purposes other than the object of its mission is strictly prohibited and may be classified as serious misconduct, without prejudice to civil or criminal actions that the Company reserves the right to initiate, in particular on the basis of breach of trust.”
A formulation of this type is not sufficient in itself to prevent misuse, but it reinforces the readability of the rules and facilitates the characterization of the facts, where appropriate.
Beyond the clauses, the internal governance plays a key role:
These devices are not only “compliance”: they also protect the manager in the event of an audit, by showing that he has taken seriously the risk ofBreach of trust.
If your company intervenes with vulnerable people, it is essential to adapt your device:
Even if the manager is often victim a breach of trust (committed by an employee, a service provider, a partner), a total lack of control or obvious negligence can put him in trouble:
Hence the importance of documenting controls, responses to alerts, and actions taken when a risk ofBreach of trust is identified.
We can talk aboutBreach of trust when three elements are present: an asset or funds were given voluntarily to a person for a specific purpose, that person diverted them from that purpose, and was aware that they were acting against the agreed rules. Typically, this is the case of an employee, a service provider or an associate who uses for personal purposes sums or assets entrusted for the activity of the company.
Les components of breach of trust are:
Without initial discount, we are instead in the field of theft; without embezzlement or fraudulent intent, we remain on contractual or civil ground.
In an SME, are frequently assimilated to a breach of trust : the use of a company bank card for personal expenses, the embezzlement of customer payments, the non-return of equipment or stocks entrusted to you, the abusive use of a power of attorney or a bank mandate. The common point is the betrayal of a power or an asset entrusted to you in a professional or contractual context.
For prove a breach of trust, it is useful to:
The more structured the case is, the more the prosecutor's office and the judge will be in a position to assess the reality of the offence.
For file a complaint for breach of trust, you can:
It is often strategic to precede a complaint with a formal notice or statement, in order to freeze the facts and encourage the alleged offender to return, if necessary.
We sometimes talk aboutmoral breach of trust to refer to behaviors of manipulation, psychological pressure or betrayal within a relationship of trust. Legally, this expression is not an autonomous category: it refers either to breach of trust within the meaning of the Criminal Code, or to other qualifications (psychological harassment, psychological violence, fraud, abuse of weakness). In practice, it is necessary to examine the facts precisely in order to choose the most relevant qualification.
THEBreach of trust on a vulnerable person refers to embezzlement committed to the detriment of people in a weak situation (age, illness, disability, isolation). In this context, the law provides for aggravating circumstances, with heavier penalties. For an SME, this concerns in particular sectors where employees or service providers work with vulnerable individuals or manage their assets.
Even if the amount embezzled is relatively weak, a complaint for breach of trust money can be justified, in particular to stop repeated behavior or to send a clear signal to all teams. Depending on the context, it is possible to opt for a gradual approach (reminder, formal notice, disciplinary sanction, then complaint), but it is important not to trivialize this type of behavior.
THEBreach of trust is a complex criminal offense, at the border between general criminal law, business law, labor law and contract law. The qualification of the facts, the choice of strategy (criminal, civil, labour law), the management of evidence and internal and external communication require specific expertise.
As an SME manager, it is in your best interest to be accompanied by a lawyer in order to:
It is a material regulated, at the crossroads of several branches of law, in which the advice of a lawyer is essential to anticipate and integrate all the legal, economic and human considerations specific to your company.